<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Pet Peeves in Blog Design and Usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Mattern</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-74925</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Mattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-74925</guid>
		<description>I can see some kinds of sites not bothering. For example, a brand new blog. But I don&#039;t get the attraction of that. For me to stick around on a blog, I probably want to get to know the blogger a bit. And if I&#039;m going to hire someone, I absolutely expect to find background information and contact details on their website. 

As for affiliate link disclosures, you could do a recommendation page if you want. I tend to prefer that over affiliate links littering sidebars. But understand your links will probably get fewer clicks that way because fewer people will see that page. For the disclosures themselves, you just have to make sure the site tells visitors that those links are based on affiliate relationships. Calling them &quot;recommended&quot; isn&#039;t a disclosure on its own. You&#039;re supposed to disclose the fact that you make money when those affiliate links are clicked. Some sites mark each affiliate link individually in some way while others have a sitewide affiliate link policy and just mention at the end of a page that the content may include affiliate links. To the best of my knowledge this is only a requirement if you&#039;re in the U.S. But it&#039;s good practice no matter where you are because it builds more trust with visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see some kinds of sites not bothering. For example, a brand new blog. But I don&#8217;t get the attraction of that. For me to stick around on a blog, I probably want to get to know the blogger a bit. And if I&#8217;m going to hire someone, I absolutely expect to find background information and contact details on their website. </p>
<p>As for affiliate link disclosures, you could do a recommendation page if you want. I tend to prefer that over affiliate links littering sidebars. But understand your links will probably get fewer clicks that way because fewer people will see that page. For the disclosures themselves, you just have to make sure the site tells visitors that those links are based on affiliate relationships. Calling them &#8220;recommended&#8221; isn&#8217;t a disclosure on its own. You&#8217;re supposed to disclose the fact that you make money when those affiliate links are clicked. Some sites mark each affiliate link individually in some way while others have a sitewide affiliate link policy and just mention at the end of a page that the content may include affiliate links. To the best of my knowledge this is only a requirement if you&#8217;re in the U.S. But it&#8217;s good practice no matter where you are because it builds more trust with visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oshawa website designer</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-74772</link>
		<dc:creator>Oshawa website designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-74772</guid>
		<description>I’ve noticed several “professional” websites lately have no contact or about web page any more. I began to think this was a “new concept”, so thank YOU for making me realize it’s just sloppy website designing that’s going on and nothing more.

What do you term as disclosure of an affiliate link? a recommends web page with an affiliat link on it that redirects once clicked. First time I saw that I immediately thought... wow, how professional! So I imitated it.

Thanks for a great post!
Trish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve noticed several “professional” websites lately have no contact or about web page any more. I began to think this was a “new concept”, so thank YOU for making me realize it’s just sloppy website designing that’s going on and nothing more.</p>
<p>What do you term as disclosure of an affiliate link? a recommends web page with an affiliat link on it that redirects once clicked. First time I saw that I immediately thought&#8230; wow, how professional! So I imitated it.</p>
<p>Thanks for a great post!<br />
Trish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Mattern</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-64688</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Mattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-64688</guid>
		<description>Technology is a great niche example where dates on posts are extremely important. I think dates are also important if you want your blog posts to be more linkable. You&#039;re likely to be excluded for roundup link posts on other niche blogs if people can&#039;t tell that your posts are recent. And those citing posts as sources for their own articles won&#039;t use yours and link to them if they aren&#039;t sure they&#039;re currently relevant. 

I&#039;m battling with a recent theme I purchased over this very issue. It was designed to show the month and day, but not the year. For the life of me I can&#039;t figure out why the designer thought that was a good idea. It&#039;s almost more confusing than having no date information at all. Fortunately that blog (still being developed) is related to fiction, so dates are less important for research purposes. But I still hope to find a fix that doesn&#039;t screw up the date area design too badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology is a great niche example where dates on posts are extremely important. I think dates are also important if you want your blog posts to be more linkable. You&#8217;re likely to be excluded for roundup link posts on other niche blogs if people can&#8217;t tell that your posts are recent. And those citing posts as sources for their own articles won&#8217;t use yours and link to them if they aren&#8217;t sure they&#8217;re currently relevant. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m battling with a recent theme I purchased over this very issue. It was designed to show the month and day, but not the year. For the life of me I can&#8217;t figure out why the designer thought that was a good idea. It&#8217;s almost more confusing than having no date information at all. Fortunately that blog (still being developed) is related to fiction, so dates are less important for research purposes. But I still hope to find a fix that doesn&#8217;t screw up the date area design too badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pope</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-64644</link>
		<dc:creator>Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-64644</guid>
		<description>Hello, thanks for outlining those points, especially number 2, relating to the often non-existent date issue. There&#039;re times when it&#039;s important to know whether the ariticle is current. For instance, if it&#039;s a technology related article, you would rather not waste your time reading articles that are a few years old.
Cheers,
Pope</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, thanks for outlining those points, especially number 2, relating to the often non-existent date issue. There&#8217;re times when it&#8217;s important to know whether the ariticle is current. For instance, if it&#8217;s a technology related article, you would rather not waste your time reading articles that are a few years old.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Pope</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Your Blog Make People Cringe? &#124; CrafterMinds</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-26046</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Your Blog Make People Cringe? &#124; CrafterMinds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-26046</guid>
		<description>[...] that the Crafterminds and I have observed as being blog mistakes.  Here&#8217;s a great article on 10 Pet Peeves in Blog Design and Usability, which covers some things that I didn&#8217;t.  Everyone has their own personal list of blog pet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the Crafterminds and I have observed as being blog mistakes.  Here&#8217;s a great article on 10 Pet Peeves in Blog Design and Usability, which covers some things that I didn&#8217;t.  Everyone has their own personal list of blog pet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Inyang</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-25933</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Inyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-25933</guid>
		<description>Always a terrible idea to require that users are registered before they can add comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always a terrible idea to require that users are registered before they can add comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Powdrill</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-25814</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Powdrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-25814</guid>
		<description>Stop now please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop now please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenize</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-25813</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-25813</guid>
		<description>Hahahahaha! That was hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMGLOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahaha! That was hilarious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OMGLOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thunk</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-25812</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-25812</guid>
		<description>c&#039;monnnn watermelon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c&#8217;monnnn watermelon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoomie</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/10-pet-peeves-in-blog-design-and-usability/comment-page-1/#comment-25811</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoomie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/articles/?p=1481#comment-25811</guid>
		<description>wow... shorty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230; shorty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

