<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Of The Most Controversial Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/</link>
	<description>DirJournal Info Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-180295</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 02:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-180295</guid>
		<description>Epic of Gilgamesh- 3000 B.C. narrates the flood story before it was in the bible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic of Gilgamesh- 3000 B.C. narrates the flood story before it was in the bible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-176958</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-176958</guid>
		<description>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was not written by Jews or Zionists.

*The protocols was a forgery. The real author/authors include infamous anti-semites in the Russian Secret Police 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Rachkovsky

* The books is also plagiarized. It clearly stole text from books written by other published authors years beforehand. This is solid evidence that the book is a fake.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion#Maurice_Joly

It&#039;s basically the biggest lie every published, and it&#039;s still really popular today, especially in countries where Islamic regimes endorse it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was not written by Jews or Zionists.</p>
<p>*The protocols was a forgery. The real author/authors include infamous anti-semites in the Russian Secret Police </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Rachkovsky" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyotr_Rachkovsky</a></p>
<p>* The books is also plagiarized. It clearly stole text from books written by other published authors years beforehand. This is solid evidence that the book is a fake.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion#Maurice_Joly" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion#Maurice_Joly</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically the biggest lie every published, and it&#8217;s still really popular today, especially in countries where Islamic regimes endorse it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Kiehn</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-154686</link>
		<dc:creator>William Kiehn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-154686</guid>
		<description>&quot;Standing for Something&quot; by Gordon B. Hinckley
&quot;Another Testament of Jesus Christ&quot; the Book of Mormon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Standing for Something&#8221; by Gordon B. Hinckley<br />
&#8220;Another Testament of Jesus Christ&#8221; the Book of Mormon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilma manzanillo</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-129753</link>
		<dc:creator>wilma manzanillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-129753</guid>
		<description>Firstly, Brave New World depicts the future shock which is now the computerization that is factual so that it is recommended for public info.  Second is the 1984 similar to the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, Brave New World depicts the future shock which is now the computerization that is factual so that it is recommended for public info.  Second is the 1984 similar to the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anarchist</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-92476</link>
		<dc:creator>anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-92476</guid>
		<description>The bible is NOT the word of GOD !!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bible is NOT the word of GOD !!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.R. Sune</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-65645</link>
		<dc:creator>T.R. Sune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-65645</guid>
		<description>Oh of course, the Bible (the Tanakh and the Synoptic Gospels, etc) and the Koran should be listed too.  Matter of fact I heard there is well over 1600 accommodates of the Bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh of course, the Bible (the Tanakh and the Synoptic Gospels, etc) and the Koran should be listed too.  Matter of fact I heard there is well over 1600 accommodates of the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Degie Paulo Galura</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-42993</link>
		<dc:creator>Degie Paulo Galura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-42993</guid>
		<description>why is it author&#039;s gone so bad? weren&#039;t they aware of what will the societies concern? T&gt;T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it author&#8217;s gone so bad? weren&#8217;t they aware of what will the societies concern? T&gt;T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gadiel</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-39884</link>
		<dc:creator>gadiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-39884</guid>
		<description>a reply to &quot;Too Damn Good&quot; (6).
your comment is based either ignorance or (more likely) antisemitism.
henry ford was a known antisemic. the second book was proved to be a fraud. created to fuel hatred towards jews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a reply to &#8220;Too Damn Good&#8221; (6).<br />
your comment is based either ignorance or (more likely) antisemitism.<br />
henry ford was a known antisemic. the second book was proved to be a fraud. created to fuel hatred towards jews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mushtaque madni</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-27922</link>
		<dc:creator>mushtaque madni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-27922</guid>
		<description>Bible can&#039;t be termed as the most controvesial book because of its more than fifty versions for, they are not versions but translations. But, Bible could be termed controversial because of ten cases of INCEST described in the first chapter GENESIS, which still are considered to be authentic, a jewish conspiracy against their own Holy Prophets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bible can&#8217;t be termed as the most controvesial book because of its more than fifty versions for, they are not versions but translations. But, Bible could be termed controversial because of ten cases of INCEST described in the first chapter GENESIS, which still are considered to be authentic, a jewish conspiracy against their own Holy Prophets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danneschetz</title>
		<link>http://www.dirjournal.com/info/ten-of-the-most-controversial-books/#comment-22265</link>
		<dc:creator>danneschetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirjournal.com/info/?p=95#comment-22265</guid>
		<description>I agree a clockwork orange should be added and also  fallen angels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree a clockwork orange should be added and also  fallen angels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

