There’s been much discussion and debate about our original article about the Top 10 Armies in the World. First written in 2010, we’ve been updating it ever since.
Nearly every country in the world has its own army to protect its interests against internal and external enemies. Most countries like to boast of their military prowess, often claiming to be one of the strongest in the world. Not all can actually back that claim with data and numbers
In an effort to quantify the rankings of the top military forces in the world, we analyzed data on over sixty countries. We based this on the most recent data available at GlobalFirepower. This includes the size of defense budget, number of active military members, tanks and armored vehicles, aircraft and helicopters, and number of naval craft.
Additionally, we considered nuclear capability and recent operations, the latter meaning that the army actually has live combat experience.
We then assigned a weight to each of these components, and finally calculated an overall score for each country. In most places, this differs from the country’s GlobalFirepower rank.
After the calculations were completed, the top ten armies in the world became easily visible as the most powerful militaries in the world.
Most of these armies were involved in the major conflicts of the modern world. Notably, these include World War I, World War II and the Korean War. Additionally, many were involved in conflicts fighting for their own country’s independence.
The Turkish Army dates back more than 2,000 years, though the modern day military branches were founded in 1920. With a force of over 730 and a budget of close to $19 billion, it is solidly in the top ten military powers in the world.
It ranks fourth on the list for tanks and armored vehicles, estimated at just over 11,000. Ground forces are additionally supported by an outsize artillery. Out of the nations on this list, Turkey is currently the only without nuclear capability.
With very few exceptions, military service is required of all male citizens after the age of twenty, contributing to the large force and reserve size. After the U.S. and ahead of France, it is the second largest ground force in NATO.
The Turkish Army was involved in the Korean War, recurrent internal Kurdish conflicts, the division of Cyprus, and recently Syria. Its largest conflict to date, however, was the Turkish Independence War. In this confrontation, it fought Russia, Britain, Greece, France and Italy along its borders. It was one of the few larger powers to remain neutral until almost the end of World War II.
The British Armed Forces were organized in 1661 and have been involved in various conflicts including the Napoleonic Wars, Revolutionary War and both world wars. In fact, only 22 countries in the world were never invaded by British forces.
The British Army has had a significant presence in Northern Ireland and the Balkans. It stood beside the United States in the Gulf War in the 1990s. The army is a powerful force in the ongoing Global War on Terrorism after the attacks of September 11, 2001.
The active duty force of the British military is over 190,000 strong, making it the second largest army in the European Union behind France. The U.K. has a defense budget of over $51 billion annually. Of the top ten military powers, it has the smallest number of active duty members but the fourth-largest budget, behind only the U.S., China, and India.
There are three branches of service. These are the Royal Navy, the British Army proper and the Royal Air Force, also known as RAF.
With nearly 750 aircraft and helicopters and around 5,500 tanks, armored vehicles, and artillery, it is a viable force and an unwavering ally of the United States.
The Pakistan Armed Forces were founded in 1947, and comprises three service branches. It succeeded the former British Indian Army after the country gained independence the same year.
Pakistan’s military history includes recurrent conflicts with its bordering neighbors of Afghanistan and India, the Gulf War and Mogadishu, Somalia in the early 90s.
The country is part of the Islamic Military Counter Terrorism Coalition (IMCTC). As such, it has been active against ISIL and other terrorist groups. Pakistan has also served as an ally to the United States in the Global War on Terrorism. It assisted in the fight against both Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and along its borders.
At the same time, the army maintains close ties with the Chinese military.
This volunteer army consists of an active duty force of over 650,000 personnel. Additional reserve forces are another 550,000 strong. Together, they make the Pakistan Armed Forces into one of the largest armies in the world.
Pakistan’s defense budget is around $11.5 billion. This may be the smallest budget of the top ten military powers, but still far exceeds the defense budget of most other countries around the world.
While on par with U.K. for naval craft, Pakistan boasts several hundred more aircraft and helicopters, over 9,000 tanks and armored vehicles, and a much larger amount of artillery pieces.
Israel maintains a conscript army. It is the only country in the world that requires military service from both male and female citizens with few exceptions.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were founded in 1948, but trace their roots to several paramilitary organizations active against the British while they held Palestine. Today, the IDF maintains an active duty force of over 170,000. In comparison, its reserves are enormous, evaluated at around 450,000.
Its fleet is fairly small, but the IDF can field considerable airpower and over 13,000 tanks and armored vehicles.
The Israeli military history includes the Arab-Israel War, the Six-Day War and numerous conflicts with Lebanon, the annexed Palestine, and frequent operations against Iran. As a whole, it is one of the most battle-tested armies of the world.
The United States remains one of Israel’s largest and closest allies, giving the IDF preferential access to new military technology. Israel’s defense budget clocks in at fully $20 billion.
Since its struggles during the World Wars, France does no longer enjoy the reputation of a military superpower. These perceptions aside, the numbers tell a different story.
France has a military of over 360,000 strong across the army, navy, air and space force and paramilitary branches. This makes it the largest army in the European Union by numbers. It is unique in letting foreign nationals serve in its forces – in the notorious and elite Foreign Legion. Unusually, the country’s police also form part of the French Armed Forces.
Compared to its one-time hereditary rival, the British Armed Forces, it commands more craft across almost all categories. The exception are some naval classes and artillery pieces. Its budget, however, is smaller than the U.K.’s, at $41 billion.
The North Korean People’s Army was established in 1939 and has an impressive size of more than 1,250,000 soldiers. When reserve unit numbers are added to this, estimates are more than seven million soldiers could be activated if needed. This makes the North Korean forces potentially the largest in the world.
Major conflicts in North Korea’s history are the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Tensions between North and South Korea still exist today. Technically, the conflict is a frozen one – it never officially ended between the two.
Its defense budget, at $1.6 billion, is nominally small. Much of its economy, however, is prepared for military use along a total war doctrine. Additionally, North Korea is a relatively close, though erratic, ally of China.
North Korea has confirmed its nuclear and chemical weapons capability in recent years with threats against various countries. This especially includes the United States, mainly for its alliance with South Korea. Over the last decade, it has also emerged as a cyber-war force to be reckoned with.
The Indian Army’s roots go back, with only minor interruptions, to the Stone Age. Today, it is the largest all-volunteer ground force in the world with nearly 1.5 million active duty soldiers. Reserves make up a force an additional 2 million strong.
India has never had to institute a draft to staff its ground force. The Indian Army – overlapping with the British Indian Army – was active in both world wars. Subsequently, the Indian Armed Forces fought in conflicts for the country’s own independence. Border skirmishes with Pakistan are common in its history.
The Indian military consists of three branches as well as several paramilitary units, and operates on a budget of more than $61 billion. While its aircraft and helicopter as well as tank and armored vehicle numbers rank it solidly in the middle of the list, it has a relatively small naval fleet. India also has more than eighty nuclear warheads in its possession.
Russia has undergone numerous changes throughout its military history. This history dates back all the way to 863. The modern day army – the Russian Ground Force – arose in 1992, following on the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Previous Russian military organizations, including the Red Army, saw combat in regional conflicts, both World Wars and numerous Cold War operations. Before the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, it was one of two superpowers in the world. By this point, it had surpassed the United States both in terms of the number of soldiers and nuclear weapons.
The Russian Ground Force draws its soldiers through a military draft. In principle, all male citizens between the ages of 18 and 33 serve for a period of 12 months. There are, however, many reasons for exception and deferral, and bribery is common.
Russia currently has over 1.2 million active duty military members and 2 million in reserves. It operates under a comparatively slim budget of more than $48 billion dollars. In terms of finances, only India, China and the U.S. are bigger spenders. Though its air force and ground capabilities are larger than China’s, the latter has been gaining rapidly, and China possesses a larger navy.
Russia also has the largest number of nuclear warheads in the world – nearly 8,000. This stock, though, is aging, and not all of it is combat-ready.
The People’s Liberation Army of China is the largest military in the world in absolute numbers. It numbers nearly 2.2 million soldiers, with a reserve over 500,000 strong. After significant cuts in forces a decade ago, numbers are again increasing.
The Chinese Army arose in 1927. It was active in the Sino-Japanese conflict, World War II, and the Korean and Vietnam wars.
While technically service is a necessity for all men over the age of 18, China has never had to draft soldiers. There have always been more than enough Chinese men who have volunteered for military service to their country.
It has the second largest defense budget, at nearly $240 billion – a full $100 billion more than a decade ago. This corresponds roughly to the combined budget of all previous countries on this list. It also houses nuclear weapons, with estimates putting the number at around 350.
The United States military’s history dates back to 1775, where it arose out of rebel forces fighting the Revolutionary War. With over 1.4 million on active duty, it now has the third largest active duty force ranking behind China and India.
However, the defense budget is what really sets the U.S. apart from all other countries on the list. With a budget of over $750 billion, it exceeds all other military budgets on this list combined by nearly $250 billion, and China’s by over $500 billion.
The U.S. Army and its special forces have participated in every major world war, the Korean War, Vietnam, the Gulf Wars, and leads the Global War on Terrorism.
The modern day Army is an all-volunteer force, though drafts have been used for long periods. It maintains numerous permanent posts throughout the United States as well as Germany, Italy, Kosovo, Japan, Korea, and other countries.
Ranking only behind Russia in the total number of warheads, the U.S. has the largest number of active warheads in the world.
The U.S. also has the largest number of aircraft and helicopters by far with just under 14,000. It’s still comfortably ahead of China in the number of tanks and armored vehicles. Its air dominance also shows in its fleet, which is smaller than China’s, but features numerous aircraft carriers and supporting craft.
View Comments
Turkey did not remain neutral throughout the entire WW2, they sideed with the Allies towards the end.
You've got something wrong there. Churchill invited the Turkish President İsmet İnönü to come to England. As İnönü didn't show up, Churchill flew from London to Adana to meet İnönü and offer him to join the Western Allies, but İnönü was intelligent enough to decline, as Turkey just came over a food shortage.
What a bunch of clowns. The French army was bigger than Germany's and had way more tanks, planes,etc. at the start of WW2. The US Army does not spread freedom; it fights our enemies on their soil. Besides, most of those photos were unrelated to the country (N Korea showed a US M-60 tank; Germany showed a US kevlar helmet; UK showed Dutch soldiers, Turkey showed a US A-10 plane).
The French had more equipment and personnel than the Germans and still got their butt kicked!!! That wont do any good to the French cause....
Nabeel u rock man .... great .... welldone
Absolute rubbish!!!! Nearly every army in the world has had its moments in history, I find it extremely bias towards the Americans, true, they have a very large standing army, but put them man to man against any British soldier and see who comes out on top!
When did you last see an American soldier bayonet charge the enemy????
As for the photos used to illustrate the different countries...where the frig did you get the one to illustrate us Brits??? (they are probably Danish or Belgian looking at their beret badge)...if you are going to brag at least get the photo right!
Remember, war is not a film/movie, it's fought not to the sound of heavy metal music or by using expensive CGI effects. Its fought using guts and determination...sorry Yanks!
First off in the past the united states has not charged in with beyonets but has killed thousands of solders who have. It has by far superior determination, technology, man power, training, and nuclear capabilities. the USA has the ability to overthrow any government in the world in a matter of weeks. The only countriest that would put up a good fight would be russia because of its nuclear capabilities, china, and any nation which resorts to gorilla warfare.
so umm every other country..
USA is not the governing body of the world.. USA doesnt have a very good success rate at anything really.
I'm an American , proud of and thankful for our military . The greatest in the world , even when our politicians hinder them . But , i'll never forget our great allies throughout history , Britain and FRANCE . Also the other members of NATO .
Silly arguments.
Despite others having more soldiers, etc.
The USA remains the most formidable fighting force, for many reasons.
But the main one is:
The USA has the technology. Period.
Science. It works, bitches.
China's military is not so bad either. What can you do what can you do against a million angry disciplined Chinese soldiers screaming for your blood? We repopulate way to fast (jks). the only way to beat us is hitting us with some nuclear missiles
Russia + China = pregnant USA.. :D
China (alone) = Pregnant USA, impotent Russia and Raped India!
pakistan wit insufficient data about father. :D
Atleast, you know who raped your arse!
None! but urs? you don't have enough fingers to count!
Indians with sufficient data about their mother-hum... r******! :-P
ok we from ur nature we can understand ...
Sons of CHINA ?? :D
I live in Dras kargil I know every thing about that Fight Who tells u that India won the kargil War in Table ya india won but on field India loss in all aspect the pakistani soldiers are posted in high altitude Jab indian soldiers uper chadne k koshish karete the tb uper sa pakistani soldiers umn par goli nai balki pather phankte tha ar ya jo pahad ha pather ka hai ar indian soldiers uper sa bhi hamla nai karsakte tha jab wo hamla karte the fighter plane sa to waha sa baday baday pather garte the ar niche unke apne army marte tha hamesha sachae ka sath dia karo india wala, ar india media jhooti khabarein bolte ha
If things goes like this , in near future all pakies will look like Mongolians. :)
The U.S have superior weapons that is why they are ranked no.1, like Iron Man-LOL!!!!!
Seriously, just because the U.S starts wars doesn't mean it can finish them. Or that they have the best army in the world. And the misconception that the French are 'cheese eating surrender monkeys' is entirely false. Learn from history, asshats.
USA has superior technology, cant deny this.
But all voulenteer force ? This is a very bad joke.
If you want a scholarship from the state, you have to voulenteer in the army & do service in order to get it & get a decent study.
This is why young people are drawn to the army, next thing about this army is that there training is poor. technology & good equipement won't make you a warrior.
With good training you get diciplined fighters.
Diciplined fighters can drive a car through Basra without driving over civilians while on patrol.
A Dutch freind of mine saw this with his own eyes, these behave like triggerhappy dicks - which is the reason people dont like them. These people are no real fighters, just tourist.
Note: all above is about the normal soldiers, not the special forces.
I think that you are missing the aspect of quality. & in order to honor that Isreal needs to be way up high, above the states.
this because they are in a constant state of training and war & they have a better overall fighter mentality, even the women.
my opinion about this issnt collored, iam Dutch.
there are many ways in the states to get scholarships the least of which joining the army. And as far as trigger happy dicks, Germany has only killed millions of civillians, the english only carpet bombed a couple of hunder cities killing millions, the russians have no regared for life killing millions of their own ppl as well as millions of others. no nation has a perfect track record but some are better than others. The united states is one of the only nations never to conquer a region besides itself(Unlike the older nations of the world). and i thank u for ur warmongering, conquering ways w/o them america would never exist as a nation... Thank u England, thank u France, thank u Germany, and thank u Spain. I love u guys.
The US Army should be number one for maximum no. of people killed, affected or raped in this century. Unnecessary wars for propaganda and imaginary wars for freedom have caused havoc in many countries, both in the Americas and the Middle East. The Vietnam War was a dark blotch in the already disgraced moral stance of these armies. In that aspect almost all European especially the French Army and the American Army are nothing but invasion armies.
The Indian Army on the other hand, also the Indian Government has not pro-actively attacked anybody. Even in the case of Bangladesh, Pakistan's atrocities were getting out of hand. The Indian Army is the only one respectable in this lot.
The Chinese and North Korean Armies are evil in basic nature. Armies are meant not to conquer but to maintain peace. Draft based armies all over the world are corrupt and fundamentally wrong. No man/woman must be forced into a war.
The Israeli army is not very different from any other genocidal army.
Any army that interferes so much with any country's politics as much as the Pakistani Army does, has lost its way. As far as I am concerned, the Pakistani Army and the ISI are responsible for every single Islamic terrorist organisation active in the Asian subcontinent.
Well, Arun maintaining an army massive in size doesn’t means at all the far more superiority that you consider Indian army has.
In contrast, Army is ranked on basis of :-
1-Command and Co-ordination,
2-History of conflicts,
3-Training skills,
4-Preformance,
5-Timing,
6-Response,
7-Manpower,
8-Morale,
9-Experince,
10-Structure of command and organization,
11-Logistics and mobility,
12-Communication and inter-connections,
13-Air, Land, Water co-ordination techniques,
14-Response time,
15-Intelligence and Reconnaissance,
16-Information process and handling techniques,
17-Support and supply,
18-Efficency, geography and terrain of operation
19-Equipment
20-Luck and On-Sight Advantage.
21-Ability of Commander to exploit the advantage in his favor.
22-Operational plan and Tactics.
An interesting phenomena that you observe while you are ranking armies is that, that they are never the way you arrange them in order and well there is an explanation for that too.
It has been observed that when you put two divisions of opposite armies against each other you would experience that the one that was expected to win or at least easily qualify was not able to do it as expected. And practical example of that are :-
1- The Losses suffered in Vietnam war by Americans
2- Indians unluckiness to cross 3-mile walk into Pakistani territory to capture Lahore (provincial capital}
Indians even being a mighty competitor losing from the hands of handful Extremists in Kargil War
3- Mighty Blow to Soviet troops in Afghanistan
Giving examples of Modern age mighty armies in modern times loosing from hands of minor competitors would justify that it is not always the mightiness rather an invisible hand that govern the performance of competitors.
Now that invisible hand is not a certain set of rules that govern the nature of conflicts rather that invisible hand is more likely to change with the change in area, nature, geography and size of a war. What i attend to say can be justified by explanations to the given forth anomalies.
US Marines and army had to re-supply its troops in Vietnam sitting hundreds of mile far from the conflict. Terrain of that area was unsuitable for army corps level movement in formations. They had little intelligence. United enemy was nowhere visible. After WWII they army was engaged in an entirely different type of conflict that can be precisely regarded as Guerilla Warfare or Jungle LIC (Low Intensity Conflict) in contrast to conventional warfare of WWII. Therefore Army had to disintegrate into fractions in search of awaiting enemy that had an advantage of know-how of terrain and due to an important factor of being local over powered the fractional US Army Marines personnel in Low intensity conflicts. US Army cannot pound the area as it has civilians in it too. So what do we see over here is that, that we have limitation of choices that we cannot pound the areas. We don’t want to move in fractions because then we will get overpowered. Looking to all condition available over there we saw that Americans Losses were well above Vietnamese. This for instance proved that Vietnamese were better off then US? Surely not. So its the conditions of war that tell us about the rank of army as far as you are concerned.
Same was the case for Soviet forces in Afghanistan.
Now we consider Indian army in-competence to complete its objective Lahore from short distance of 3-5 miles with a well-prepared mighty force. When we see into the reasons of this uncompleted objective, we find that there were many more other factors that were playing against Indian army that instance giving a way ahead advantage to Pakistani Army (its counter part).
Pakistan army takes maximum or 3-4 days to mobilize its military to the border from stand-by time to operational mode in contrast to Indian massive military that takes 14 precise days to get into operational mode losing precious time in which Pakistanis could have prepared them selves for the massive blow from Indians by strengthening there defenses, which is what they did on 6th September 1965. Another factor was a BRBL Canal in between Indian forces and its objective. Pakistanis knew that in front on border line it would be impossible to stop 2 Indian corps with only 1 out of 2 operational divisions in hand. So Pak made BRBL their defense line strengthening it for a major blow from Indians. And practically one defensive brigade stooped the movement of whole two full operational offensive corps sized force of Indian army. Another factor was a 10 mile away Pakistani airfield that pounded Indians more certainly then Indians did.
There fore it is enough to justify that is not the size or tactics only but some times its the odds of nature that play against you being might
What i have seen in contrast under your comment is that, that you have ranked them in No-Accordance to rules set forth but on personal affiliations as your name shows that you are an Indian, which i consider to be a purely unproven and impractical truth.
@ROY Yes Some odds in natural play do the winning! but that doesn't meant that Taliban forces are mightier than USSR or US Army. There a saturation point for every one, Taliban or Pakistan army will reach there soon. That time, till the saturation point(were about 90% ammunition and strength used up), at some instances(one or two as you mentioned above), they may have an equal hand or little upper as you said because of some natural play, that hand will only have shot life span. But that will lead army to saturation and got exhausted. Just the time gap before exhausting, political level influences will come for help to avoid the marginal pure defeat and being conquered by Major one (US , USSR , India etc).
US army Failed in Vietnam miscalculation, that doesn't meant Vietnamese are better. Its natural play. But a lot of chances are there for US to try for Vietnamese saturation point. But US fools Failed to make it at to it, else Vietnam will be written in golden Letters in US army history.
As like in 1965 clear cut conquer of lahore by India delayed b'coz of miscalculation, just before Pakistan armies saturation. more than 80% artillery have been fired up (while 15% by of India's) and Pakistan's political level influence leads to Tashkent agreement committing big loose by Pakistan to avoid further defeat and getting conquered by India. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+pk0152)
Like Wise Afghan militants are supported by ISI and USSR failed to make it in control Pakistan through foreign policy. But this doesn't meant that Afghan Militants are more capable.
You are trying to catch up the things as like in a GODLY manner. But ROY, ur way of talking etc seems like you oppose US,USSR,INDIA so may be a paki! So your are one amoung the gr8 bluff masters by saying "ranked them in No-Accordance to rules set forth " so is this also not in accordance to rules (may be out of your GODLY rules! funny!) http://www.globalfirepower.com/ haha. According to your GODLY rules which Army is best? haha :)
hey as for as i think u r very bullshit and unknown person . for ur knowledge PAKISTAN ARMY is one who try to create peace in this world. any place in world where conflict happend. only PAKISTAN ARMY finish that. and PAKISTAN ARMY has brave soldiers as compared to indian soldiers
hey r u remember 1965
Highly hypocritic. Losers never accept the truth. So does pakistanis
Hey looser.... Here is the truth. Accept it!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_unEiDHsnQ
A Video on Youtube showing pictures of Conquered Territories by Pakistan Army. Crescent and Star (Pakistani Flag) fluttering on top of Indian mornuments. (Recognize any of them?). Even some details in Hindi (the sign board).
Plus.... you will also see captured Indian tanks (Russian technology forbidden to Pakistanis). Must be the bounty of war that you left behind.... while running away from the battlefield. Enjoy the Video!
let me tell you pakistan has contributed the most no of personnel in the un than any other country and pakistani's are never liars!!!
HAHA then UN is a terrorist orgnanisation rite?
Ask the secretary general.... and check the U.N website while you are at it. (also check reports of Indian state sponsered terrorism on Kashmir by U.N and other Human Rights Organisations.... reports that never make it to
shitty-pedia!)
By your standards... Perhaps even Nato and U.S forces are terrorists too... They take help from Pakistani army every now and then!
i know dat UN and USA are not. u slow brain feel pity on u. U even dont understand wat I gave the comment as.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3459617.stm
u r supplying nuclear to other worst nations.
about ur double game.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/27/opinion/27tue1.html
u r going for peace? wat a joke"
The worst nations ever to hold nuclear arsenal are India and Israel.
Although, India is dirt poor and much more filthy.
The measures are different but they can be ranked in the same category!
IF THE WORLD COMMUNITY TAKES AWAY NUCLEAR TECH FROM INDIA ALONG WITH ALL THE WEAPONS AND FUTURE CAPABILITIES;
WE'LL HAVE NO REASON TO KEEP OUR OWN. WE WILL HAND OVER OUR NUCLEAR WEAPONS GLADLY!
how come you say that India dirty and poor? haha..
http://www.news-world.us/pics/2010/08/22/60-worst-countries-in-the-world/ see this which is dirty and poor.. pakistan is compared to Somalia. But they are more cultured than u people. Nuclear weapons u re trying to achieve is now more than Britan. With out considering ur poverty and terrorism problem and development u sikfigs are trying to gain numbers.. wow...
Which part of the world did you resolve any conflict and bring peace? I have not heard a single news of it. The very word Pakistan brings pictures of terrorism and man slaughter to the eyes.
yaar nabeel i m telling u frankly u r such an idiot. let me make this clear i am not a muslim but i love and respect Islam and when it comes to muslims, i love them as my brothers.."URDU AND HINDI are sisters", Islam is all about peace. we enjoy Eid and Diwali..I am a die heart fan of Dr. APJ abdul kalam" . BUT I strongly Object u when u say "pakistan army is best" They dont even blv in democracy..Generals always seeks to ambush Pakistan's federal system. ISI is best in gathering intelligence but worst in exercising its policies (nd let me make it clear RAW is no match for ISI). i felt sad when NATO forces striked Pakistan troops, many soldiers died but how did ur genrals respond?? U know what! Your army is out of control dear. though they have the potential of becoming the best in the world...while on the other hand Indian Army is improving day by day..I dont understand y do they attack when they have to retreat in the end..As an Indian i love my country and respect ur view about Pakistan but u r continuously trying to prove a point which is not true. Well in case of OSAMA even ISI failed
LOL, Indian Army did they forget Nefa where it got defeated by China, Run from Kuch and 1965 attack on and defeat from Pakistan. The Maldeves and Sri Lanka fiasco. These are just to name few.
India have defeated pakistan in 1965 war(go to wikipedia or any trusted site) there is few good defence from pakistani soldiers but they are defeated ! u can check the overall result , ok
Wikipedia........ trusted....... LMFAO!
Wikipedia is not a "trusted" source of information. Its a "play ground" for bloggers like yourself to twist facts and post bogus info. To be precise nothing related to "India" is trustable on Wikipedia.... thanks to Indian Bloggers and the "Edit" feature!
@nabeel::
hahahaha... u all r jus... any truth said by any one will not be agreed by u people.. especially coward psychic Pakistanis.. Can you show me any where that PAK won in the war 1965, kargil etc. U g_ys at border will break cease fire and to help the militants (brain washed 9s) to indian soil. Almost 75% of these leaches were killed, but som wer do blasts in dark and kill innocent people and flew, but later they ll b caught and hanged. Be bold like male and stop this gay lik fighting. CAN U?
1965 War movie with pictures of loosing Indian army, conquered Indian territories and war bounty(crappy russian technology)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_unEiDHsnQ
Nice mUsIc .. Huh? :-D
1971 war refuges caught ant ur gvt tried to help them by releasing a stamp to get the attention of d world.
urbrain activity is tooo ban Nab eeeel....
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/ef/PakistanPoW.jpg
u can neglect .. i dont care.. but truth remains as it is
Wikipedia is a community, any one edited will be published after checking the truth. After google, most hits are caught by wiki. You r saying that al thse peoples are stupids to read fake information hahaha.. poor brain activity nab eeel. Now you can Say Un-trustable only about India. haha :D :D :D u dont hav any bloggers (ho IQ less people ..) y u people dont edit the details about wars of 1947,56,71 etc and even kargil. Wiki wont publish because all posts r done by insane. :D
Wikipedia..... Checking the Truth. LOL! By who? another brain-washed egoist Indian?
Quit your yap.... Dont you people have anyother reference to show besides Wikipedia....? Is that all you got....?
You really need to know read before you respond. Kindly read the above discussion where I have pointed out time and again that Yes. Indians did win the 1971 War by exploiting Bangladesh Civil war, invading Pakistan and breaking every rule in the U.N and Geneva Convention.
However, you Indians are in a state of denial "as always" about loosing the 1948,1965 War with Pakistan (Got your butt kicked in Kargil-1999 too), not to mention the 1962 War with China that you lost as well.
@ Insane Stupid.. Can u point out any where.. that u won 65 and kargil with real things and proofs. I have send u a link of US Congress about these wars. After catching kargil point U f**kin pakistanies sticks were fried up at second face and you s**krs gone for mercy of US. >> haha..Y to talk about china. They are another Ba*t*ds dont have any social values. Yes we committing we lost.
But have u won any war? NO .. the whole world knows well. @ kargil wat u hav got nothing ! u lost lot of soldiers and u told evry one that they ar militants.. shame on u Su**k**r
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_unEiDHsnQ
is that al u got? U r pasting it al over this forum.. this only...
1965 u started war starting phase we ar little slow bcause a war with china has jus ended. so we lost but after we reach up to lahore. u wont agree but. u kick at a*s for single time and hav it back wit 10 times more al the time. haha.. have it and feel it
Ok. On a serious note.... I didnt understand a word you said! Personally, i believe you, your links and your comments are all fake and hate-filled.
Most importantly, i dont have time to answer every stupid comment posted by lame retards!
Ok. some time u dont know english or u dont have used ur spex. All my links are hate filled haha. Your comments and abuses and links are all LOVE filled especially towards Indians, British & USA & Russia.. I felt all Great Jokes, dirty minded insane's jokes. u attacked evry one, who told the truth, even if porkistan was not mentioned.
u ll regret. :D :D
I didnt crack any joke on U.S, U.K or anyother nation.....
I didnt even crack a joke on India.... you people are a joke yourself. Patheitic and Laughable
Ur facts and hate filled unsecured replays make us laugh uncultured porkistani..
Even if and I am saying if Pakistan attrocities were going out of hand, Your nation is NOT a regional Police man. Period!
What you did was wrong and went against every single United Nations (and other internation) conventions.
Plus, India should worry about its own Govt influence and Army inflicted atrocitties in regions like Kashmir and Gujrat, which continue even till this day.
Where ever there is presence of Indian military (particularly army), Loot, Murder, Rape and Plunder continue!
Not Going out of hand al left. Indian militrary Rapes loot.. etc :D U people som times know the facts because we reached up to Lahore in 1965 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Brig.Hari_Singh_at_Barkee_Capture.jpg
wer u located? :D
In pakistan every day atleast an avg 10 will die by blast. Even high officials and ministers are getting shot dead in the name of same religious insanes. And u re talking about India. Even in wikileaks sardari (Ur PM do u kno dat?) told dat India have good stability in all means. But pak gvt is very unstable and useless. We Indians have to understand the situations. Not from any news channels from wikkileaks.. Search der under category of pak. And u r sayin about looting....... real Joke of 2011
LOL! Hey Wiki Loon, What about people dying of disease, famine, flood and neglect every day in India...? Do you have any stats on that? I dont think you would have that in Wikipedia ... would you?
I you do, please do send us a link!
While you are at it, mind showing us the number of Kashmiris, that Indian Armed Forces have killed in the past 63 years..... not to mention crimes against humanity and against minorities in Utar Pardesh, Gurat, Assam, Sikkim, Bihar.....or any toehr Indian states.
That would be great help. Thanks. :-P
(You people have been fighting atleast 5 different civil wars... killing your own citizens while criticizing us on 1. Good Grief!)
I live in Lahore.....you idiot. You people never reached the city because we kicked your BUTT in 1965 and kicked it hard. You fled leaving behind dead bodies and crappy Russian tanks. We still have them as Soveigners. Check Video for details:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_unEiDHsnQ
Not much as pakistan. . . This is a land of diversity. I know my place more than u know. But India never faced a worst situation lik this what now ur Pakistan is facing. . . haha. . One mor thing u can tell about some disease, even not any sort of disease is reported in India as major issue near by can you specify. No u cant but some issues with swine flue. I agree. But caught al over world especially in west.
U cant talk about famine, Now last decades no famine death is reported. we tank the Gvt by providing basics with cheep cost its all der in PAK now.
Yes we will kill those who are all insane in religion also recruited by ur militants no other way but even we try to convince and took to law..
Ur military killing ordinary peoples and ministers and rapping child*en.
create a site and paste this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_unEiDHsnQ
100 times even though no one will agree 65 war u WON. U caught one village but we caught up to Lahore. u wont agree i know. I cant brain wash u coz u dont hv dat damn thing. poor brain activity
Ya.... I know.... now anything i provide .... would be fake... Be it pictures, documentaries or whatever.
Truth really hurts ... doesnt it?
There is an easier solution to the problem.
Get a specialist to check out the authenticity of the pictures! and quit knocking your head off!
KHEMKARAN & MUNABAO are the two places in deep inside India(in video). Both are railway stations.
KHEMKARAN 2.3 km from indo pak border MUNABAO 800 meter from indo pak border
(check google map)
Deep in INDIA.. Funny. I feel so pity on you insane @ nab.
Sikh soldiers captured.. hoo look carefully in dat pic its is a Indian camp they were laughing and playing as like in home. crappy suc*king video.
mr nab eel(he is busy with posting this video every where)
Are those Monomets in pak while india gave back to u after war? or can you tel me the xact thing with out BLAH BLAH, as I mentioned above.
a you nabeel keepquit ok what you are saying is truly opposite for india
Yes.... i know you people just heard of democracy and "freedom of speech" during early 1980's.... this must be new for you!
Telling about your 80's is not that wat he asked. Check our medias they are free to express any thing in any religion. Check our judiciary (wont hang any mother in the name of religion as ur judiciary did)
http://wn.com/Insulting_Muhammad_is_hanging_to_death_in_pakistan
http://4bya.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/a-christian-woman-has-been-sentenced-to-hang-in-pakistan-after-being-convicted-of-defaming-the-prophet-mohammed/
so pathetic cruel insanes.